vendredi 16 mai 2014

The rules of chess

This article is an excerpt of the number one chess website bestofchess. Chess rules, the laws of chess:
The rules of chess are set by The  the World Chess Organization (FIDE), with some modifications made by some national organizations for their own purposes. There are variations of the rules for fast chess, correspondence chess, online chess, and chess variants.
Chess is a game played by two people on a chessboard, with sixteen pieces (of six types) for each player. Each type of piece moves in a distinct way. The goal of the game is to checkmate, that is, to threaten the opponent’s king with inevitable capture. Games do not necessarily end with checkmate – players often resign if they believe they will lose. In addition, there are several ways that a game can end in a draw.

Setup of chessboard:

The chessboard is a square board divided into 64 squares of alternating color. No matter what the actual colors of the board, the lighter-colored squares are called “light” or “white”, and the darker-colored squares are called “dark” or “black”. Sixteen “white” and sixteen “black” pieces are placed on the board at the beginning of the game. The board is placed so that a white square is in each player’s near-right corner. Horizontal rows are called ranks and vertical rows are called files.
Each player controls sixteen pieces:Each player begins the game with sixteen pieces: 1 king, 1 queen, 2 bishops, 2 knights, 2 rooks, and 8 pawns.
chess board initial setupAt the beginning of the game, the pieces are arranged as shown in the picture: The pieces are placed, one on a square, as follows:
The rooks are placed on the outside corners, right and left edge.
The knights are placed immediately inside of the rooks.
The bishops are placed immediately inside of the knights.
The queen is placed on the central square of the same color of that of the player: white queen on the white square and black queen on the black square.
The king takes the vacant spot next to the queen.
The White moves first, then players alternate moves. Making a move is required; it is not legal to skip a move, even when having to move is detrimental. Play continues until a king is checkmated, a player resigns, or a draw is declared. In addition, if the game is being played under a time control players who exceed their time limit lose the game.
The official chess rules do not include a procedure for determining who plays White. Instead, this decision is left open to tournament-specific rules such as Round-robin tournament or Swiss system tournament or, in the case of non-competitive play, mutual agreement, in which case some kind of random choice is often employed. A common method is for one player to conceal a piece of each color in either hand; the other player chooses a hand to open and reveal their color. Play then commences with white.

Movement of each piece:

First of all, we should mention that white always moves first. After the first move, players move by alternance one piece per turn. Pieces are moved to either an unoccupied square or one occupied by an opponent’s piece, which is captured and removed from play. With the sole exception of en passant, all pieces capture opponent’s pieces by moving to the square that the opponent’s piece occupies. A player may not make any move that would put or leave his or her king under attack. If the player to move has no legal moves, the game is over; it is either a checkmate if the king is under attack, or a stalemate (a draw) if the king is not.

The king moves:

The king moves one square in any direction. The king has also a special move which is called castling and involves also moving a rook.
moves of a king

The rook moves:

The rook can move any number of squares along any rank or file, but may not leap over other pieces. Along with the king, the rook is involved during the king’s castling move.
moves of a rook

The bishop moves:

The bishop can move any number of squares diagonally, but may not leap over other pieces.
moves of a bishop

The queen moves:

The queen can move any number of squares along rank,file, or diagonal, it combines the power of the rook and bishop, but it may not leap over other pieces as the knight can do.
moves of a queen

The knight moves:

The knight moves to any of the closest squares that are not on the same rank, file, or diagonal, thus the move forms an “L”-shape: two squares vertically and one square horizontally, or two squares horizontally and one square vertically. The knight is the only piece that can leap over other pieces.
moves of a Knight

The pawn moves:

The pawn may move forward to the unoccupied square immediately in front of it on the same file, or on its first move it may advance two squares along the same file provided both squares are unoccupied; or the pawn may capture an opponent’s piece on a square diagonally in front of it on an adjacent file, by moving to that square. The pawn has two special moves: the en passant capture and pawn promotion.
moves of a pawn

Castling

castlingCastling consists of moving the king two squares towards a rook, then placing the rook on the other side of the king, adjacent to it.Castling is only permissible if all of the following conditions hold:
The king and rook involved in castling must not have previously moved;
There must be no pieces between the king and the rook;
The king may not currently be in check, nor may the king pass through or end up in a square that is under attack by an enemy piece (though the rook is permitted to be under attack and to pass over an attacked square);
The king and the rook must be on the same rank .

En passant

en passantIf player A’s pawn moves forward two squares and player B has a pawn on his fifth rank on an adjacent file, B’s pawn can capture A’s pawn as if A’s pawn had moved only one square. This capture can only be made on the immediately subsequent move. In this example, if the white pawn moves from a2–a4, the black pawn on b4 can capture it en passant, ending up on a3.



Pawn promotion

If a pawn advances to its eighth rank, it is then promoted (converted) to a queen, rook, bishop, or knight of the same color, the choice being at the discretion of its player (a queen is usually chosen). The choice is not limited to previously captured pieces. Hence it is theoretically possible for a player to have up to nine queens or up to ten rooks, bishops, or knights if all of their pawns are promoted. If the desired piece is not available, the player should call the arbiter to provide the piece.

Check


A king is in check when it is under attack by at least one enemy piece. A piece unable to move because it would place its own king in check (it is pinned against its own king) may still deliver check to the opposing player.
A player may not make any move which places or leaves his king in check. The possible ways to get out of check are:
Move the king to a square where it is not threatened.
Capture the threatening piece (possibly with the king).
Block the check by placing a piece between the king and the opponent’s threatening piece.
If it is not possible to get out of check, the king is checkmated and the game is over .
In informal games, it is customary to announce “check” when making a move that puts the opponent’s king in check. However, in formal competitions check is rarely announced.

End of the game


Checkmate:


CheckmateIf a player’s king is placed in check and there is no legal move that player can make to escape check, then the king is said to be checkmated, the game ends, and that player loses. Unlike other pieces, the king is never actually captured or removed from the board because checkmate ends the game.
The picture shows a typical checkmate position. The white king is threatened by the black queen; every square to which the king could move is also threatened; it cannot capture the queen, because it would then be threatened by the rook.


Resigning

Either player may resign at any time and their opponent wins the game. This normally happens when the player believes he or she is very likely to lose the game. A player may resign by saying it verbally or by indicating it on their scoresheet in any of three ways: by writing “resigns”,  by circling the result of the game, or by writing “1–0″ if Black resigns and “0–1″ if White resigns. Tipping over the king also indicates resignation, but it is not frequently used . Stopping both clocks is not an indication of resigning, since clocks can be stopped to call the arbiter. An offer of a handshake is not necessarily a resignation either, since one player could think they are agreeing to a draw .

Draws

The game ends in a draw result if any of these conditions occur:
  • draw exampleThe result is automatically a draw if the player to move is not in check but has no legal move. This situation is called a stalemate. An example of such a position is shown in the picture to the right.
  • The game is immediately drawn when there is no possibility of checkmate for either side with any series of legal moves. This draw is often due to insufficient material, including the endgames
  • king against king;
  • king against king and bishop;
  • king against king and knight;
  • king and bishop against king and bishop, with both bishops on squares of the same color.
  • Both players agree to a draw after one of the players makes such an offer.
  • The player having the move may claim a draw by declaring that one of the following conditions exists, or by declaring an intention to make a move which will bring about one of these conditions:
  • Fifty-move rule: There has been no capture or pawn move in the last fifty moves by each player.
  • Threefold repetition: The same board position has occurred three times with the same player to move and all pieces having the same rights to move, including the right to castle or capture en passant.
  • If the claim is proven true, the game is drawn.
At one time, if a player was able to check the opposing king continually and the player indicated their intention to do so, the game was drawn. This rule is no longer in effect; however, players will usually agree to a draw in such a situation, since either the rule on threefold repetition or the fifty-move rule will eventually be applicable.

Timing

Tournament games are played under time constraints, called time controls, using a game clock. Each player must make his moves within the time control or forfeit the game.
There are different types of time controls. In some cases each player will have a certain amount of time to make a certain number of moves. In other cases each player will have a limited amount of time to make all of his moves. Also, the player may gain a small amount of additional time for each move made, either by a small increment added for each move made, or by the clock delaying a small amount of time each time it is started after the opponent’s move.
If a player delivers a checkmate, the game is over and that player wins, no matter what is subsequently noticed about the time on the clock.
If player A calls attention to player B being out of time while player A is not out of time and some sequence of legal moves leads to B being checkmated then player A wins automatically.
If player A does not have the possibility of checkmating B then the game is a draw .
The United States Chess Federation (USCF) rule is different. USCF Rule 14E defines “insufficient material to win on time”, that is lone king, king plus knight, king plus bishop, and king plus two knights opposed by no pawns, and there is no forced win in the final position. Hence to win on time with this material, the USCF rule requires that a win can be forced from that position, while the FIDE rule merely requires a win to be possible.
If a player is out of time and also calls attention to his opponent running out of time, then:
If a sudden death time control is not being used, the game continues in the next time control period .
if the game is played under a sudden death time control, then if it can be established which player ran out of time first, the game is lost by that player; otherwise the game is drawn .
If a player believes that his opponent is attempting to win the game on time and not by normal means (i.e. checkmate), if it is a sudden death time control and the player has less than two minutes remaining, the player may stop the clocks and claim a draw with the arbiter. The arbiter may declare the game a draw or postpone the decision and allot the opponent two extra minutes.
Read the full chess rules article here: chess rules.

mardi 29 avril 2014

Anton Korobov

This article is an extract from the chess website bestofchess.com.... you can read the full article by clicking on the link below.Anton Korobov, Warsaw 2013
Full name Антон Коробов
Country:  Ukraine
Born (1985-06-25) 25 June 1985 (age 28)
Kemerovo, Russia
Title Grandmaster
FIDE rating 2698 (April 2014)
(No. 46 in the December 2012 FIDE World Rankings)
Peak rating 2720 (August 2013)
Anton Korobov (born 25 June 1985) is a Ukrainian chess Grandmaster (2003). He won the 2013 European Blitz Chess Championship.
Chess career Korobov won the 2002 and 2012 Ukrainian Championships and finished second behind Andrei Volokitin in 2004. In 2011, he came first in the Nakhchivan Open. He took part in the Chess World Cup 2011, but was eliminated in the second round by Nikita Vitiugov. In February 2012, he tied for 1st–3rd with Mateusz Bartel and Pavel Eljanov in the 11th Aeroflot Open. Korobov was outright 3rd in the Ukrainian Championship (2013) behind Yuriy Kryvoruchko and Ruslan Ponomariov respectively. In the World Cup 2013 in Norway he eliminated Vasif Durarbayli, Baadur Jobava, Daniil Dubov and Hikaru Nakamura, but in the fifth round he was knocked out by former World Chess Champion Vladimir Kramnik, after losing the first game and drawing the second. Korobov has not played for the Ukrainian national team although he has expressed interest in doing so.
“I was nearly or immediately hopeless after Move 15,” he said in a brief commentary to Susan Polgar. According to Korobov the whole strategy in the game was absolutely wrong. Tomorrow Ukrainian is White, “I think the capital punishment is waitng for me but I should do my best to cope with this situation.”
GM noted the question sounded provocative, but he replied anyways: “Maybe there were guys who were making the decision [of] who should live or die, to play or not to play, maybe they lack chess literacy, or maybe they are just [being] wise, maybe I am too unpredictable to join the team… I don’t know what the reason is. I am always ready to play and previously, last year, at the Olympiad in Istanbul they were playing with me asking all the time: “Are you ready?”, “Are you sure you are ready?” And then there was a very nice saying from the chief coach: “Good-bye.””
А.MAKSIMOV: Good evening, I just connected to GM Anton Korobov and of course my choice wasn’t accidental. As you already know Anna Ushenina, who at some point made a big stir at the Women’s World Championship,mentioned that Anton is helping her during the competition. Apart from that she also comes from Kharkov and is of the same age as Anton.
So, Anton do you know her well? Are you two connected anyhow? I mean, maybe you’ve been attending the same chess school or had the same coaches?
A.KOROBOV: I know her well. In general we aren’t connected by anything. Well, she just works in the same field with 64 squares, but we don’t interact that much. We’ve been attending the same Kramatorska chess school though. That’s it.
Anton-KorobovMy name’s Evgeny Surov and we are talking to “the man from Kemerovo” – that is
Anton Korobov, however it turned out afterwards that you are you evaluate her play? Isn’t it strange to see the finalist with 2450 rating?
A.MAKSIMOV: Did her performance in Khanty-Mansiysk surprise you? How can be explained her result?
A.KOROBOV: That’s a hard topic, I mean Anna’s performance. I was more surprised by her games than by the results. For example, her game against Nadezhda Kosintseva. Any, even a great chess player would be happy to be the author of this game. That’s fabulous.
A.MAKSIMOV: Today Anna mentioned that you have been helping her during the competition. What do you say?
A.KOROBOV: Yes, we’ve been working hard with Anna before the championship, Gennady Krugovoi, our sport chief in Kharkov, initiated that.
A.MAKSIMOV: How would you evaluate her play? Isn’t it strange to see the finalist with 2450 rating?
A.KOROBOV: Well, that’s a very hard question. Women’s chess is always kind of exorcism… in the finest sense of the word which I really unexpected but he did it . This is what I can state: Anna has a huge and not fully fulfilled potential.
A.MAKSIMOV: It seems that Anna has made the least mistakes at this competition. If for instance, Antoaneta alternates brilliant moves with blunders, Anna’s play looks like Petrosian’s style… Do you agree?
A.KOROBOV: I don’t think so. Her style is closer to Reshevsky’s play in his heyday. That’s combination of universalism and optimism, energy and the instinct of the bloodsucking killer.
I can only wish Anna luck in the final. It’s all in her hands, including the victory.
A.MAKSIMOV: What do you think of today’s tie-break?
Anton Korobov, the new Champion of Ukraine, an extraordinary player and companion, will be on the air of Chess-News radio tomorrow at 20:00 MSK Time. Leave your questions below, please specify your name.
The Ukrainian Chess Federation once again gained practically the strongest composition for the championship which is scheduled to take place on June 15-26. From the top grandmasters only Vassily Ivanchuk will skip the competition.
A.KOROBOV: Today’s tie-break was a Klondike for those missing some grey hair. Anna demonstrated great preparation in the 1st game and brought the game to the conclusion. In the 2nd game, it was Chinese player’s turn to do the same, she ventured to sacrifice the exchange and then found a very strong 28.Nh6!. But then she just couldn’t cope either with her nerves or with time. Alas? Hurrah?!!!
Ukraine has voted for the best chess players of the year for the 10th time. Anton Korobov and Anna Ushenina won the the prize “Chess Hetman 2012.” As you know GM Korobov won the Ukrainian championship, Ushenina became the world champion.
The voting was held among Ukrainian chess players, journalists, coaches and experts. By the way, Anton Korobov surpassed Vassily Ivanchuk who eventually became second.
The newspaper Komsomolskaya Pravda Ukraine reports that executive committee of Ukrainian Chess Federation (UCF) held a meeting recognizing Ukrainian sportswomen’s performance at the World Championship as successful.

ANISH GIRI

This article is an extract from the chess website bestofchess.com.... you can read the full article by clicking on the link below. Chess is a game which had evolved around 500 B.C. is a game of mind a chess enhance your brain and make you more competitive and refresh and revitalize your mind as this game mainly depends upon your mind skill that how are you going to catch your opponent and to win the game
Many neurologists also believe that as this game enhances your mental skills and capabilities so the peoples who are weaker in mental capabilities they are sometimes recommended to play chess. 
There are special types of checks which are enlisted below:
v  DISCOVERED CHECK: Basically in it there is a discovered attack on opponents king
v  DOUBLE CHECK: In it there is a check from two pieces  to the opponents king in a single move you make
v  CROSS CHECK: This is done when  a check is responded by a check from your opponent side blocking the first check
When the discussion is going on chess then the first thing comes in your mind is a small boy with determined eyes and an appealing face having an overall charismatic personality yes! You recognized him he is one and only ANISH GIRI hero of all hearts and a living champion for all a real champion who had ever lived
Family:
It was a bright day of 28 June 1994 in saint Petersburg the sun was smiling and the clouds were singing that today a world is going to have a real champion born and then the most awaiting moment arrived and the doctors announced to a Russian mom Olga GIRI and Nepalese father Sanjay GIRI a baby boy is born and you are proud parents of a cute innocent faced baby boy his first look wins a heart of everyone
ANISH GIRIThis boy was named Anish giri by his parents this name Anish had come from lord Krishna and means supreme ultimate so he proved to be supreme as his name reflects no one had ever wondered then this cute intelligent baby is going to be the youngest world chess champion and is going to fascinate this whole world with his achievements and will win the hearts of every one and whenever chess will be played or seen his name will flash in mind.  Anish giri have two sibling sisters whose names are Natasha and Ayusha the proud father of Anish giri works as a researcher in company named DELTARES. This proud family were Russia based till the year of 2002 but afterwards they migrated to Japan  and resides there till the year of 2008 never forgetting  his birth place  he continuously pay visits to  his mother land Russia currently they are residing in Netherlands and this country is proud to reside him
CARRER: Basically Anish giri’s career indicates that he must had started playing the game of chess from his cradle or he had learnt it all in his mothers womb as a child of only 7 years of age had started to play chess and not only this he is planning to beat his much experienced chess players as his opponent
This small boy plays chess in a way like that while looking it and his all achievements and all track records it indicates that chess is as easy to him as writing an alphabet.

His career starts from age of 7 and then few years later in a small age of 9 years he gains his first victory in the famous Russian under 12 championship this was a best starting he can made and after such a great starting he promised to himself to never look back
Although with limited facilities available at his disposal he starts to be a teacher of himself and that was enough for him he won his first game when he played In the year of 2008 at the event of Intromart at Hilversum and then the next year only in 2009 he was holding his 2nd award in a chess festival at Groningen this year proves to be a lucky one and he won his 3rd award when he was ranked as second in the corus group 2009 tournament this proves to be the best achievement as now he was youngest grand master of chess only in the age of 14 years 7 months and 2 days and the most surprising this is that he won gm without enough practice and this proves that he is a capable and proving person.
This young dynamic boy with sweet determined eyes confident face with a sharp mind who is a born champion and loves to prove himself best every time when he comes in front of world so that the world can witness that he is a born champion and a champion of all champions who had win the hearts of his fans all round the world. 
Anish giri was placed first when he won by 6/8 at Dutch championship 2009 so his success train is moving on with high speed then in the year of 2010 in group b chorus he won with a bang and get invited for 2011 championship in A group the chess Olympiad held in 2010 proved to be a very successful tournament for giri  where he won a bronze medal  by scoring 8/11also represented Netherlands in 2012 Olympiad where he set 4/7 on board.
Anish giri had also played in the famous SK TERM EMSDETTEN in German budesliga where he named another record for himself and is regarded as youngest player who had ever played this challenging tournament he does not stop over here and get qualified for 2013 world cup he played in first 2 rounds but as failure is only a step for success so he won G45 In October 2013 he played at a European club cup where he individually wins a silver medal and his team won bronze medal. 
According to the ratings of 1st march 2014 giris current rating is 2745  which makes him the top player in nether land  and also top junior in under 20 in whole world and he holds 18th position all over the world his FIDE rating in rapid is 2764 and in blitz its

Aleksandr Morozevich

This article is an extract from the chess website bestofchess.com.... you can read the full article by clicking on the link below. Most probably, one of the more popular grandmasters, Aleksandr Morozevich is an extraordinary player. He was born on 18th of July 1977 in Moscow. He is currently ranked 29th of April 2014 in the world, but has been as high as number two.
He has the recognition of being one of the best players around, yet this immense talent culminates in an extremely unpredictable personality. He can be flying high and all of a sudden drop 50 plus places. He has a massive fan base due to his unique opening moves such as the ones – Chigorin Defense, as well as the latest one – the Albin Counter gambit. His aggressive style of play makes him popular; yet recently his complaint to an interviewer that he must be boring, because he cannot find any game of his among the greatest games ever played. His style of play leads to wins or losses and he is the GM with the least draws. Due to this aggressive style of play, he is also very inconsistent. During the 2011 World Cup, he surprised everyone by offering his opponent Grischuk, a draw after only 12 moves. This does not matter; Aleksandr Morozevich is exciting and at his best the best in the world. He can tear any field apart on his day, yet he can lose interest fast as well. It is as if he has a split personality. In 2011 he, nearly retired after accepting a job to coach Zhu Chen, the Qatar based female chess player. He is a sportsman as well as artist alike, yet he places too much pressure on himself.
He gained respect as a 17-year old after winning the Lloyds Bank tournament in London with an amazing 9.5/10 points. In 1997, he was the top seed at the World Junior Chess Championship but lost in the final. In 1999, he entered his first super tournament and finished fourth. In 2000, he finished fourth in the Corus Chess Tournament, which Kasparov won. He was Russian champion in 1998. Sadly, it took him eight years to be Russian champion again. In the same year, he finished sixth in the FIDE world championship. He achieved a hat trick of wins in Biel in 2003, 2004 and 2006.
He was the first player to defeat the newly crowned world champion Vladimir Kramnik in 2001. He won the Ciudad de Pamplona tournament in 2006 where he came second behind Magnus Carlsen. In his Russian championship win in 2007, he had six straight wins, which is an amazing achievement at any level. Not only is he a professional chess player, but he is also an author. He also released a book titled “The Chigorin defense according to Morozevich” in the same year.
There was a review by the St. Louis chess club stating that the chigorin defense started out with the moves 1.d4 d5 2.c4 Nc6. It seemed weird to most chess players to bring the knight out to c6 on move two, but to the legendary Chigorin it was the only way to play. Chigorin loved active piece play owning to his uncanny attacking instinct. According to the Chigorin defense, the quicker all the black’s pieces were got, the better the performance was. He often obtained a lead in development in his own chigorin games, which seemed weird since he was playing black!
The book provides an extensive coverage of the opening lines. Morozevich claims that he has published all of his analysis because he is making a switch to other openings, so has no reason to hold anything back from the reader. Indeed the book is rather heavy with variations, many worked out by Morozevich and his trainers. Most of the games are Morozevich’s, hence the title.  If you are interested in an exciting and active defense for black, then the chigorin is for you.” 
In June 2008, Morozevich won the Bosna tournament with a margin of 1½ points ahead of second place. In 2008, he was leading the Tal memorial and even climbed to number one in the world for a while only to fall again after finishing fourth.
In 2011, he won the Russian Higher League championship with an impressive eight from 11 points. This allowed him entry into the Russian Championship Super Final in 2011 where he placed second.  A month later Aleksandr Morozevich won the Saratov Governor’s Cup in Russia.
He excelled in team competitions. The Russian team won the gold medal in the Chess Olympiad three times and in 2005, they won the gold in the World Team Championship.
His best game was organized between Ljubojevic, Ljubomir – Morozevich, Alexander which took the second player forty three moves in order to win the match.
Aleksandr MorozevichHe is also very good at blind chess and won the tournament a couple of times. As unpredictable as he is which goes totally against the cool, calm and collected nature of chess players, he will stay a force to be reckoned with for many years. In fact, he is described as one of the top international blind chess players. He has taken part in the Amber blindfold tournaments many times. Every time in the tournament, there were lots of elite chess players, so it was very competitive. He got several achievements in this type of tournament. He was the champion in 2002, 2004, 2006 and 2008 and his scores were 9/11, 8.5/11, 9.5/11 and 6/11 respectively. He got the second prize in 2003, 2005 and 2007 and his scores were 7/11, 6/11 and 7/11 respectively.
Aleksandr Morozevich is a true chess fanatic. He loves playing chess so much that he once mentioned that his greatest fear was to be unable to remember how pieces move when he woke up one day. He also loves reading books about chess. Five favorite books of his are “Manual for beginner”, “Combinations”, “Psycho-analysis of chess play”, “Defeat” and “Winning Pawn Structures”, whose authors are Pozharsky, Blokh, Herbstman, Zagainov and Baburin respectively. He has his unique chess playing style – laid-back, not worrying about what his opponent will do as if he is taking a break.

Aleksandr Grischuk

This article is an extract from the chess website bestofchess.com.... you can read the full article by clicking on the link below. The Russians have always been acclaimed for their dominance in the world of chess. From the great Mikhail Botvinnik and Alexander Alekhine to Anatoly Karpov and Garry Kasparaov, the chess champions from Russia have always dominated the world. One such Russian champion, though not as the same pedigree as the aforementioned names, happens to be Aleksandr Igorevitch Grichtchouk (or Alexander Igorevich Grischuk).Born in Moscow on the 31st of October 1983, this grand master was taught to play chess by his father at the age of 4. He was then coached by Mikhail Godvinsky till he turned 7 and then until the age of 10, Maxim Blokh took up the reins as a coach. The mentor who truly turned him into a chess champion was Anatoly Bykhovsky. It was under Bykhovsky’s tutelage that he won the title of International Master at the tender age of 14. In his youth, he had the unique distinction of winning the under 10, 12, 14 and the under 16 Russian chess championships but never the World Junior Chess championship. This Russian grand master who specializes in blitz chess has cited many chess greats like Aron Nimzowitsch, Robert James Fischer and Anatoly Karpov as his influences. He is currently ranked 6th in the FIDE world chess rankings and is ranked 2nd in the Russian rankings behind Vladimir Kramnik. Aleksandr Grichtchouk was bestowed the title of Grand Master by the FIDE in the year 2000 at the age of 17. His first international title was the Lausanne Young Masters in the year 2000 and he quickly lapped up that performance by reaching the semi finals of the FIDE world chess championship in the same year and he did all this at a very young age of 16. He was defeated by the eventual runner up of the tournament, Alexey Shirov.

In 2001, Aleksandr Igorevitch stood 2nd in the prestigious Linares International Chess tournament, which is often considered the Wimbledon of chess, behind his compatriot Garry Kasparov who won the tournament with a far greater points tally. He was also a part of the Russian Chess team that won the Gold medal at the World Chess Olympiad during the years 2000 and 2002. While he struggled to over come his Russian compatriots in the normal chess tournaments, he was fast building a reputation as a rapid chess player. Often regarded as one of the best Blitz players in the world, he won his first rapid chess tournament in 2003 at the 10th Ordix open. He won the World Blitz Championship in 2006 and by then had a notorious reputation of finishing matches very quickly, even in the slower formats of chess. Grichtchouk had once famously quoted that all the chess matches must have shorter time frames and that the usual chess formats were quite slow and boring. At this point he was often criticized for his blitzkrieg tactics and was largely regarded as a blitz chess champion who could rarely have an impact in the normal chess realm. He went on to disprove this and proved his pedigree in the 2009 Linares International where he won the tournament by narrowly beating the Ukrainian player Vassily Ivanchuk by seven points. He came second in the following Linares International edition in 2010 behind the Bulgarian Vaselin Topalov, which incidentally happened to be the last Linares tournament ever to be held. 2009 was another great year for the Russian as he won the Russian Chess Championship the same year.The year 2011 however, continued to be a near miss for the Russian as he again stood second in the World Chess Championship behind the eventual winner and compatriot Sergey Karjakin. Gold in 2011 eluded him yet again as he only could manage a Silver in the World Team Chess Championships. The only shining moment of the year 2011 was him winning the individual Gold in the European Team Championship where Russia stood 5th overall.

Aleksandr-IgorevitchAleksandr Grichtchouk won the World Blitz Chess Championship in 2012 which made him the only chess player to have won the prestigious tournament twice. This win totally enhanced his reputation as a Blitz chess player and made him a legend in the Blitz chess circuit. Blitz chess on the other hand has always been looked down upon by the serious chess players. It does not require long hours of concentration like the normal formats and this could be the primary reason why Grichtchouk’s reputation as a serious chess player usually takes a hit. Compared to his esteemed compatriots he is not a well known name in the media. Though this accusation may largely be hearsay his reputation among serious chess followers is huge, considering the fact that he has been in the world top 10 rankings of the FIDE for the past decade, which is no mean feat for a Blitz player. He has won many open tournaments and was also a record holder for the highest rating achieved at the Internet Chess Club. He even won the Amber Blindfold tournament in the year 2010. His most noted game came in 2001 where he beat a top player called Evgeny Bareev in just 17 moves. This goes to show that the Russian is definitely not a one trick pony and at the age of 30, he still is a young player with a long way to go in the world of chess.

In Russia, Aleksandr Igorevitch has continued to live in his birth city of Moscow. His passion for chess moved into his love life as he married the Ukrainian Grand Master Natalia Zhukova, who happens to be a top chess player in her own right. Apart from the world of chess, Grichtchouk happens to be a professional Poker player who has participated in the top poker championships. Born in a family of atheists he claims to be agnostic. When asked if Poker has deteriorated his chess game, Aleksandr Igorevitch simply answered that chess was not the only thing in life. All this definitely adds to the allure of a personality that is.

Wilhelm Steinitz

This article is an extract from the chess website bestofchess.com.... you can read the full article by clicking on the link below.“Place the contents of the chess box in a hat, shake them up vigorously, pour them on the board from a height of two feet and you get the style of Steinitz” these were the very words of Henry Bird as he described the chess masterWilhelm Steinitz. Wilhelm, who was later to be renamed to William, was a grand Austrian chess player who was famous for unpredictable moves on the checkered board. He reigned undisputed for 8 years (1886-1894) until he lost the title to Emanuel Lasker.
Before he ventured out to create his own chess moves, the Austrian Chess master played by the book for quite a while and used famous moves like the All Out Attack which was famous around the 1850-60’s.It was this particular move that made him win a tournament in 1860. But how did the Austrian chess player rise to such a prestigious position as a chess player? Where did he spark the interest of pursuing chess as a professional career?
The story dates to 1848 when he played his first chess game and actually developed an interest. He continued playing and only when he joined a college in Vienna to study mathematics did he start taking the game seriously. By this time he was in his twenties and he quickly became a force to reckon with while at the college. By 1850 he had already risen to position three in the Vienna Chess Championship, and this motivated him to move to first position by 1860. This is when the All Out Attack worked wonders for him.
Noticing his prowess and ingenuity on the chess board, Wilhelm Steinitz was selected to represent Vienna at the London Chess Tournament in 1862. Though he came sixth in the contest, he received the brilliancy prize for an extraordinary win against Augustus Mongredien. But he was not done yet, he went on to challenge Serafino Dubois to a chess board which he won with less effort. It is at this point that he decided chess playing should become a profession for him.
To challenge someone who had taken a position above you in the London Tournament is definitely new, and perhaps so many people thought he was acting out of ego. However, the Austrian Chess player was in nature a relentless person, in one of his famous quotes he writes “Chess is not for the faint-hearted; it absorbs a person entirely. To get to the bottom of this game, he has to give himself up into slavery, chess is difficult, it demands work, serious reflection and zealous research. Only honest, impartial criticism leads to the goal. Unfortunately many regard the critic as an enemy, instead of seeing in him a guide to the truth”.
It is such spirits in him that made him challenge the unbeatable to a match and to prove them wrong.  As he took chess professional, he then embarked on challenging most of the UK best chess players to a match. He summoned the likes of Frederic Deacon and Joseph Henry Blackburne to a match; which he won automatically.
Wilhelm Steinitz was soon known as one of the top chess players in London, such fame that brought him the chance to duel with Adolf Anderssen; a top chess player also in London who had won first place twice at the London International Tournament for chess. This very match with Adolf was recorded in history as one of the toughest he had ever faced. However after gruesome hours of strategy and wit, he came out with an eight win six loss score that saw him scoop the £100. From this point on he was unbeatable in most matches; between the years of 1862-1892, the chess player from Austria always walked away a victor in any match he was in, sometimes with a very big margin at that.
Henry Bird was one of the men who accurately described the true nature of this Austrian chess champion. In his prime years between the 1860’s and the 1870s, the Romantic move which was an all attack move is what won him most matches. However at the peak of 1973, he decided to try out new moves to conquer his opponents. This new position was heavily critiqued at that time and most of the chess players of that time considered it a coward move. But there was one truth about the positional move; it was an aggressive attack strategy that gave him so many advantages in a game.
Wilhelm SteinitzIt was not until 1890 that this self invented move by Wilhelm Steinitz was accepted by chess players of that time. It even became a standard move that was perfected by most of the top players of that time and even the chess players in the present. In fact, the Austrian Chess Champion was once quoted saying “….the players of today, such as Lasker, Tarrasch, Pillsbury, Schlechter and others have adopted my principles, and as is only natural, they have improved upon what I began, and that is the whole secret of the matter.
As much as he was a brilliant player in chess, this self realization at times landed him in trouble. The Austrian chess player most times came out as a proud person and always wanted to prove he was the best. This was not only seen in how he aggressively pushed to challenge the best of the best especially in England. He was always on the move to challenge new chess gurus that he forgot about the financial part of it at some point.
He got into a nasty debt at some point when he lost his old players, who contributed largely to his income, to pursue new arrivals. On the side, he used to write a lot and document the new moves he invented along the way. In his nature, he believed he was the best around and often times he defended his written works against those who tried to critique him. Several times it caused heated debates which at times involved insults that it was later to be named as the Ink War.
Besides playing chess professionally, winning most times, and writing about it, Wilhelm Steinitz also seemed to have a soft spot for America. He was later to change his name to William to fit his new American environment. As to prove his obsession with America, here is a quote from him.

Vladimir Kramnik

This article is an extract from the chess website bestofchess.com.... you can read the full article by clicking on the link below. Vladimir Borisovich Kramnik was born on June 25, 1975 in a town of Tuapse, Russia. His father was a sculptor and his mother was a teacher. He went to chess school Botvinnik Kasparov for his studies. He read his first book Anatoly Karparov as a result of which he started playing chess at the age of five. Some say he has been god gifted and some believe in his creative skills for his strategies. His vision is so alike from the rest, which makes him the true owner of titles he has been receiving ever since.
His first noteworthy victory was in 1992 Chess Olympiad in Manila, where he won a gold medal and confirmed his seat for Russian team. In the year 1995 he became world’s number one rated player. Garry Kasparov and Vladimir Kramnik shared the same rating but the latter played more number of games as compared to Kasparov which helped him to reach the position of number one. This record stood for 14 years until Magnus Carlsen in January 2010 broke it!
Kramnik first time received an award: Chess Oscar for his outstanding performance in 2000 World Chess Championship. On Thursday November 2, 2000 he became first 14th World Chess Champion. He was unbeaten in 86 classical games over 18 months up to July 2000.  In 2002 he played eight games against the chess computerdeep fritz in Bahrain. The score was 3-1 for four games. He resigned the fifth and sixth games rest two were ties. In 2004 February he won Tournament of Linares for the first time. In 2004 itself he defeated Hungarian grand master Péter LékóYear 2005 can be stated as the crux of his life. Vladimir Kramnik was diagnosed rheumatic arthritis. He was on treatment during which he took a break from the game for six months. He made a comeback in 2006 Chess Olympiad in Tyrin where he scored best individual score.
In the very same year World Chess Title Unification Championship was announced. Vladimir Kramnik was playing against Veselin Topalov. This championship was a controversial one! It all started with the suspicion of frequently usage of toilet by Kramnik. Topalov’s coach thought he has been receiving some sort of assistance from the outside. Kramnik was leading in the first four games by 3-1. Due to this controversy he refused to play the fifth game as a result of which Topalov was awarded points. After twelve regular games match was tied. On 13th October 2006 Kramnik won the rapid tie-break and was once again awarded by Chess Oscar.
 After a significant victory on 30th December 2006 he married in Paris to Marie-Laure Germon, who works as a journalist in Le-Figaro. They got acquainted during an interview. She worked in “debate and opinion” editorial department. Marie was having knowledge about chess and when the newspaper had to publish the article about Kramnik they sent her. That was how they met. From, Marie he bore two children; daughter Daria and son Vadim Vladimirovich.
In September 2007 the World Chess Championship was won by Vishwanathan Anand, Kramnik securing the second position. In 2008 he again played with Anand in Bonn and lost the match. In 2010 he won against Magnus Carlsen but later on he lost the match with Anand which knocked him out of the first place. He was sharing the second position with Alaxie Sherov.
Vladimir KramnikLater on in May 2010 it was exposed that Kramnik aided Vishwanathan Anand in preparation for World Chess Championship 2010 against Veselin Topalov. Anand won the title retaining his position. Kramnik’s attempt to defend his 2009 title at the Tal Memorial in Moscow ended with a 7th place, while he finished 5th in the London Chess Classic in England. Later on in 2012 he was not particularly impressive during the first half, but scored the 6th place at both the Tal Memorial in Moscow and the Dortmund Classical in Germany.
Kranmik has always been realistic and persistent in his approach. He has incredibly molded Opening Theory in ChessTo this Vishwanathan Anand has said “I don’t know exactly how many lines he’s established, but you get the impression that for the last 10 years we’ve only been using his ideas. … His stamp on opening theory is much more significant than mine.”

Once Kramnik admitted in a very popular Russian weekly magazine that besides all the fame and victories he has been acknowledged to he still plays because of the interest and the game. He enjoys his success journey more than the success itself. According to him the difference between winning and losing is very short lived. He believes in his own karma no matter he loses the game or wins it. The basic idea behind every game is to give your best and never get disheartened with results of it.
Kramnik accepts that his style of playing is different from the rest and so he quotes I’m drawn more towards positional, strategic play rather than tactics. It’s been that way for me since childhood.”  He further tells that his strength is his positional play and gradually outplaying his opponent. He admits the style he owns lies somewhere between Garry Kasparov’s and Anatoly Karparov’s. It is the mix of both.
As he finished school he was already a member of national team he didn’t see a point in getting enrolled into a university. To combine chess with studies was next to impossible for him. Kramnik reveals that it would have been possible to do it just for show, but he would not have been able to give time to his studies in this case. Graduating from university just to have a diploma doesn’t interest him, and the kind of education he might have got is what he has essentially attained.
Kramnik has an ability to play chess without looking at the board. According to him the quality of play now is by no means worse than before. He states that “I think its pure physiology, and with age some things are lost irrevocably.”